THE PROGRAMME

Everything included in the course.

A comprehensive, structured preparation system — not a collection of resources. Every element is designed to build accuracy first, then speed.

All 20 question types covered
Complete dissection of every UCAT question type across VR, DM, QR and SJT — strategy, worked examples, and the traps most students fall into.
2.5 hours of live teaching per week
1.5-hour live strategy session + 1-hour evaluation session every week. Active, structured teaching tailored to your patterns — not passive lecture.
Guided practice + strategy personalisation
1 hour of structured homework per week. Not just drilling questions — guided practice with strategy modification based on your individual weak points.
Access to 4,000+ practice questions
A bank of over 4,000 questions to build fluency and test strategy under realistic conditions across all four subtests.
3 full mock tests
Three timed, full-length mock exams to simulate real UCAT conditions, track your score progression, and identify remaining gaps before exam day.
All lesson recordings provided
Every session is recorded and made available so you can revisit any strategy, re-watch worked examples, and review at your own pace between sessions.
Consistent evaluation sessions post-course
Free evaluation sessions continue after the course concludes — ongoing progress monitoring and strategy refinement right up to your exam date.
Progress tests at Week 10 & Week 16
Structured mid-course and late-course progress tests to assess strategy retention, identify remaining gaps, and recalibrate preparation before mock test phases.
Pre-lesson test before the course begins
A short test before each lesson to strategically analyse weaker question types — so the course targets your specific gaps from the very first session.
Free interview preparation workshop
A dedicated workshop covering MMI and panel interview technique, ethical frameworks, and medical school-specific interview formats — included as part of the course.
Free Med/Dent applications & counselling workshop
Guidance on medical and dental school applications, personal statements, and admissions strategy — a free workshop to support students through the full admissions process.
FREE TO START
Book a free diagnostic consultation first
A 30-minute call to assess where you are and whether this programme is the right fit.
Book Free Consultation
OUR STORY

From sitting the UCAT to teaching it — the long way around.

What started as a personal obsession with understanding how the exam works became a teaching practice built on real patterns, not textbook theory.

01
2020

Sitting the UCAT

Sarthak sat the UCAT as a school leaver — 97th percentile, 99.95 ATAR, and offers from 12+ medical schools across Australia. What stood out wasn't just the result, but the realisation that most preparation material was built for volume, not understanding.

02
2021

Teaching begins — one student at a time

Starting with a single student, Sarthak began refining a teaching approach that prioritised locked-in strategy over memorised approaches. Each session revealed new patterns in how students think — and where standard preparation falls short.

03
2022–2023

Every major UCAT system studied. One built from scratch.

Two full UCAT cycles spent understanding how students approach each question type — and personally completing every major UCAT preparation system. UCAT Complete Guidance was built to make strategy-first preparation the default, not the exception.

04
2026

Graduated as a medical doctor. Still teaching.

Graduating from Flinders University MD while continuing to run full UCAT cohorts. 230+ students prepared. 78% with medicine or dentistry offers. The 2026 cohort's highest score reached 2,580 — top 50 in Australia.

05
2027

The journey begins — with you.

Each new cohort brings new exam patterns, new feedback, and new refinements to the strategy framework. If you're preparing for UCAT in 2027, this is where it starts.

STUDENT REVIEWS

What students say about UCAT Complete Guidance.

230+ students prepared. Here's what the experience looked like from their side.

★★★★★

"Before starting with Sarthak, my practice scores were all over the place. After just three sessions I understood why. On exam day I scored 2,340."

Priya S.
2,340 · University of Adelaide Offer · 2025
★★★★★

"Jumped from 55th to 92nd percentile. Every question type has a framework, and the frameworks actually work under time pressure."

James R.
2,370 · UNSW Medicine Offer · 2025
★★★★★

"The 1-on-1 strategy session changed everything. My VR accuracy went from 60% to 83% within a week."

Amelia T.
2,295 · Monash University Offer · 2025
★★★★★

"The post-course evaluation sessions are what made the difference. That level of support doesn't exist anywhere else."

Daniel K.
2,410 · University of Queensland Offer · 2025
★★★★★

"Sarthak's approach to VR doesn't try to make you read faster — it teaches you what to look for and what to ignore."

Sophie L.
2,260 · Flinders University Offer · 2025
★★★★★

"Went from 550 to 730 in Decision Making alone. By the end I had a clear approach for every DM subtype."

Marcus B.
2,330 · Curtin University Offer · 2025
★★★★★

"Genuinely the most intelligent UCAT teaching I've encountered. Sarthak understands the exam at a structural level no question bank can replicate."

Kavya N.
2,580 · Top 50 in Australia · 2026
★★★★★

"My score improved by 170 points over six weeks. No fluff, no empty reassurance — just clear, direct strategy."

Aiden W.
2,300 · University of Adelaide Offer · 2025
KEY RESOURCES

Free guides, tools, and insights for UCAT preparation.

Practical resources built from real exam sittings and hundreds of student sessions.

DATA · UCAT ANZ 2026

UCAT Percentiles 2026: Where Does Your Score Rank?

The number on your UCAT result means nothing without context. Here's exactly where every score sits in the 2026 cohort.

UCAT ANZ 2026

Interactive Tool
Know your exact percentile — instantly
Enter your score, pick your state, see which med schools you're targeting.
Open Calculator →

Your UCAT score is made up of three cognitive subtest scores (VR, DM, QR), each scaled from 300–900, giving a total cognitive score out of 2700. Universities rank applicants against the full sitting cohort — so your percentile matters as much as your raw score.

1,964Mean total score (2026)
580Mean SJT score (2026)
~17,000ANZ candidates per year

2026 Score Percentiles — Total Cognitive (out of 2700)

Each decile represents 10% of the sitting cohort. A score at the 9th decile means you outperformed 90% of all candidates.

DecilePercentileTotal ScoreVRDMQRSJT
1stTop 90%1,610520530530486
2ndTop 80%1,720550570570525
3rdTop 70%1,800570590600550
4thTop 60%1,880600620630570
5thMedian (50%)1,950610650660589
6thTop 40%2,040630670690607
7thTop 30%2,120660690730621
8thTop 20%2,220680720820640
9thTop 10%2,340730750880664

Source: UCAT ANZ 2026 official preliminary results. The median row (highlighted) is the score 50% of all candidates scored below.


What the percentiles actually mean for admissions

Most Australian medical schools using UCAT set interview cutoffs between the 8th and 9th decile — meaning only the top 10–20% of candidates are invited to interview. A score at the median (around 1,950) is unlikely to be competitive for direct-entry medicine at most Go8 universities.

The gap that matters

The difference between the 7th and 9th decile is roughly 220 points on the total score. That gap — the one separating a competitive application from a non-competitive one — is not random. It comes down to specific subtest strategies, particularly in VR and QR where score variance is highest.

How scores have shifted year on year

The 2026 mean total score of 1,964 is slightly higher than the 2025 mean of 1,941. QR continues to show the widest score spread — the gap between the 1st and 9th decile in QR is 350 points, compared to 210 in VR and 220 in DM. This makes QR the highest-leverage subtest for improving your percentile.

YearMean TotalMean VRMean DMMean QRMean SJT
20251,941620642679586
20261,964~628~650~686580

2025 data: UCAT ANZ official summary statistics. 2026 subtest means estimated from decile data.


Knowing your percentile is the starting point — knowing which subtests to target is what actually moves it. We've helped students improve their total score by 300+ points on their UCAT. Book a free diagnostic consultation to find out where your marks are going and what a realistic improvement looks like for your sitting date.

GUIDE · UCAT ANZ 2026

What UCAT Score Will Get You Into Med School?

There's no single answer — it depends on your state, your ATAR, and which universities you're targeting.

Every Australian medical school using UCAT sets its own threshold — and the gap between the easiest and hardest entry points is enormous. The same score that lands you an interview at one university leaves you well short at another.

The short answer

For highly competitive universities like Monash and Adelaide, you need to be in the top 10–15% of UCAT candidates (roughly 2,300+ total score) to be genuinely competitive — even as an in-state applicant.


Entry Requirements by State

Select your state below. Scores shown are indicative competitive thresholds for in-state applicants.

UniversityCourseUCAT ThresholdFormulaInterview?
UNSW SydneyBMed/MD (6yr)~92–93rd %ile
~2,270–2,300
~Equal thirds: UCAT / ATAR / MMISemi-structured panel
Newcastle / UNE (JMP)BMedSc/MD (5yr)96–97th %ile
~2,400–2,420 to get interview
UCAT → interview shortlist only; PQA + MSA decide offersMSA (in-person, 8 stations)
WSU / CSU (Joint)BClSc(Med)/MD (5yr)Weighted formula
NSW cutoff ~795 weighted; GWS local ~760
VR-weighted: (Total + 2×VR) / 5; ATAR = threshold onlyMMI (Zoom, ~450 spots)
NSW tip

At UNSW a 92nd–93rd percentile is the floor. At JMP (Newcastle/UNE), UCAT only secures the interview; the MSA decides offers. At WSU/CSU, Verbal Reasoning is triple-weighted, making it the single most important subtest for that school.

UniversityCourseUCAT Threshold (VIC)UCAT Threshold (Interstate)FormulaInterview?
Monash UniversityBMedSc/MD (5yr)~93–94th %ile
~2,300 (VIC metro, Dec round)
~97–99th %ile
99.8+ ATAR + 97th %ile UCAT typically required
~Equal thirds: UCAT / ATAR / MMIMMI online, 8 stations × 10 min
La Trobe UniversityBMedSc/MD (5yr) — Rural entry onlyLower threshold
Rural/regional VIC applicants only
—Rural selection criteriaInterview
VIC note

Monash runs two interview rounds. December uses UCAT only (~94th %ile for metro VIC). Interstate applicants typically need 99.8+ ATAR alongside a 97th+ percentile UCAT. La Trobe's BMedSc/MD is rural-entry only.

UniversityCourseUCAT Threshold (QLD)FormulaInterview?
University of QueenslandMD Provisional (3+4yr)~95th %ile
Lowest 2026 interview invite: 2,290 (non-rural)
25% UCAT / 25% ATAR / 50% MMI; SJT = tiebreakerMMI, 8 stations × 9 min
CQUniversity → UQ MDBMedSc at CQU + MD at UQ (3+4yr)~2,350–2,400 est.
Rural/regional QLD priority
25% UCAT / 25% ATAR / 50% MMIMMI (same as UQ format)
QLD tip

UQ's formula is transparent: 25/25/50 (UCAT/ATAR/MMI). The UCAT gets you to interview; the interview is where offers are won. Rural applicants received invitations from UCAT scores as low as 1,960 in 2026.

UniversityCourseUCAT ThresholdFormulaInterview?
Adelaide UniversityBMedSt/MD (6yr)~85th %ile
~2,200 (SA applicants)
40% ATAR / 40% Interview / 20% UCATMMI online (Zoom)
Flinders UniversityBClSc/MD (6yr)~79th %ile (formula threshold)
UCAT is only 10% of ranking — ATAR of 99.90–99.95 is the real requirement for metro applicants
90% ATAR / 10% UCAT — no interviewNo interview
SA note

Flinders has no interview. The ~79th percentile is the minimum threshold for the formula — not a guide to what's competitive. Metro applicants need an ATAR of 99.90–99.95. For Adelaide, the interview carries 40% weight — a strong MMI can offset a lower UCAT.

UniversityCourseUCAT Threshold (WA)FormulaInterview?
UWAMD via BBiomedSc (2+4yr)~90th %ile
~2,230 (WA resident)
50% Interview / 30% ATAR / 20% UCATIn-person MMI, 8 stations × 10 min
Curtin UniversityBMBBS (6yr)~90th %ile
~2,230 (WA local)
Shortlist: 35% ATAR / 35% CASPer / 30% UCATMMI format
WA tip

WA has the highest interstate bar of any state — UWA effectively requires ~99th percentile UCAT for non-WA applicants. Curtin is the only Australian med school that also requires CASPer.

UniversityCourseUCAT ThresholdFormulaInterview?
University of TasmaniaBMedScMD (5yr)50th %ile — minimum to proceed
Competitive in-state: ~87th %ile (~2,170+). Interstate: ~95th %ile+.
ATAR = primary ranking; UCAT = tiebreaker within ATAR bandNo interview
TAS note

UTAS's 50th percentile is a minimum eligibility threshold — not a guide to what's competitive. In-state Tasmanian applicants need around the 87th percentile to be meaningfully competitive. Tasmanians have a major structural advantage with 75% of places reserved for TAS residents.


What Score Should You Be Aiming For?

Total ScoreApprox. PercentileWhere you stand
2,340+~90th %ile+Highly competitive at most schools, including Monash and Adelaide.
2,270–2,339~93–89th %ileCompetitive for in-state applicants at UNSW, Adelaide, UWA.
2,170–2,269~87–92nd %ileCompetitive for UTAS in-state. Borderline for Adelaide and UWA.
Under 2,170Below 87th %ileBelow competitive threshold for most UCAT-required schools. Rural pathways may apply.

Not sure where your score sits? We've helped students improve their total scores by 300+ points on their UCAT. Book a diagnostic test to find out which subtests are holding you back and what a realistic improvement looks like for your sitting date.

GUIDE · UCAT ANZ 2026

What Is the UCAT ANZ?

The UCAT is the main entry test for medicine and dentistry in Australia and New Zealand. Sections, scoring, 2026 exam patterns, and what to prioritise in prep.

UCAT ANZ 2026 · Beginner's Guide

The University Clinical Aptitude Test Australia and New Zealand (UCAT ANZ) is a standardised admissions test used by most Australian and New Zealand universities to select students for undergraduate and provisional-entry medicine, dentistry, and related health programs. It assesses your thinking skills under time pressure: verbal reasoning, decision making, quantitative reasoning, abstract thinking, and situational judgement.

~17,000Candidates per year (ANZ)
2 hrsTotal test duration
178Total questions
900–2,700Cognitive score range

The Four Sections

Verbal Reasoning (VR)
Scored 300–900
Decision Making (DM)
Scored 300–900
Quantitative Reasoning (QR)
Scored 300–900
Situational Judgement (SJT)
Band 1 (best) to Band 4 · Reported separately
How scoring works

Your total cognitive score is the sum of VR + DM + QR — ranging from 900 to 2,700. SJT is excluded from the cognitive total. Universities use your percentile rank within that year's cohort. The 2026 mean total was approximately 1,964.


What the 2026 Exam Actually Tested — Section by Section

Based on feedback collected from students across multiple 2026 sittings, compiled by a medical doctor who has tutored over 230 UCAT candidates.

Why this matters for your preparation

Question banks and official sample tests don't always reflect the real exam's style or difficulty distribution. Knowing what genuinely came up in 2026 means you can weight your preparation toward what actually matters.

VR — Verbal Reasoning
  • Author/conclusion-type questions dominated — the majority required identifying what the author concludes or assumes, rather than factual recall
  • Passages were 3–4 paragraphs long — some question banks use longer passages; don't be surprised by how concise the real passages are
  • True/false/can't tell questions remain common — the key discipline is committing to "can't tell" whenever the passage doesn't explicitly confirm a statement
DM — Decision Making
  • Logical puzzles were less straightforward than official question banks — scenarios included statements defined as either a truth or a lie
  • Syllogisms required strong pattern recognition across All/Some/None combinations
  • Vague language was common in premises — expect "most", "some", and "can be" rather than clear absolutes
QR — Quantitative Reasoning
  • Higher frequency of mean/median/mode and percentage questions than in some practice banks
  • Questions stayed within roughly 4–5 calculation steps — the real exam was more efficient than some practice banks
  • Strategic skipping matters more in QR than any other section — flag time-heavy questions and return
SJT — Situational Judgement
  • Scenario complexity was manageable for students who knew the ethical framework
  • Primary ethical values (patient autonomy, non-maleficence, beneficence, justice) are the framework every scenario should be read through
  • Students who internalised the framework reported pattern-matching rather than reasoning from scratch

These patterns reflect student feedback from 2026 sittings and are not official UCAT ANZ disclosures.


How It's Used in Admissions

How UCAT is usedUniversitiesWhat it means for you
One-third of rankingUNSW, Monash, AdelaideEvery point counts — but strong interview can compensate
Interview shortlist onlyNewcastle/UNE (JMP)UCAT gets you in the door; the interview decides the offer
25% of rankingUQ, CQU pathwayInterview (50%) matters most — UCAT and ATAR equally weighted
10% of rankingFlindersATAR dominates at 90% — UCAT is the tiebreaker
Tiebreaker onlyUTAS, GriffithOnly resolves ties within the same ATAR band

Common trap

More practice questions ≠ better scores. Without a consistent strategy, you'll find results fluctuating — 60% on one mock, 40% on the next — because you're approaching the same question type differently each time.

✓ Strategy first, volume second ✓ Consistent mixed-section practice ✓ Lock in your approach per question type ✓ Skip wisely in QR ✓ Learn the SJT ethical framework
STRATEGY · VERBAL REASONING

UCAT Verbal Reasoning Tips: Why Most Students Lose Marks

You've done the practice. You know the format. VR is still your lowest score. Here's the part most resources don't cover.

UCAT Verbal Reasoning

VR isn't hard because the passages are complicated. It's hard because the statements are designed to mislead you — and they do it in specific, repeatable ways.

Most UCAT verbal reasoning tips tell you to read faster or manage your time better. Students aren't losing marks because they didn't read the passage. They're losing marks because they answered a question the passage never asked.

~30%

of VR marks are lost not on difficult passages, but on statements that sound correct — because students assume reasoning the passage never gave them.

What this means for your timing

VR gives you 44 questions across 21 minutes — less than 30 seconds per statement once you've read the passage. The students who score well aren't faster readers — they've trained themselves to pause on specific trigger words in the statement before committing to an answer.


Three traps that appear in almost every sitting

Trap 01

The Assumed Link

PassageThe hospital introduced a new triage system in March. Patient waiting times fell significantly in April. StatementPatient waiting times fell because the hospital introduced a new triage system.

Answer: Can't Tell. Most students mark True — the logic feels airtight. But the passage described two events in sequence. It never said one caused the other.

The rule: if you see because, led to, as a result of, due to in a statement, the passage must have explicitly made that connection. If it didn't, the answer is Can't Tell — every time.

Trap 02

True Event, Wrong Reason

PassageThe school changed its uniform policy in 2019. Parents had written to the board throughout 2018 requesting changes. StatementThe school changed its uniform policy because parents had complained about the cost.

Answer: Can't Tell. The event happened — the policy did change. But the statement adds a specific reason (cost) that the passage never mentioned. The cause is fabricated.

This is the harder version of Trap 01. The event is real, so True feels safe. What students miss is that the reason in the statement is new information — introduced by the question, not the passage.

Trap 03

Absolute Language

PassageMost patients with this condition respond well to the standard antibiotic course. StatementAll patients with this condition respond well to the standard antibiotic course.

Answer: False. The passage said most. The statement says all. One word — but it's the difference between a qualified claim and a universal one.

Whenever you see always, never, all, every, only, must, entirely in a statement, check whether the passage used that word. It almost never did.


Why more practice alone won't fix this

If you're not identifying why you got a question wrong, you're not learning from it. Getting an answer wrong and moving on just reinforces whatever instinct led you there.

55–60%

of incorrect VR answers fall into a small number of trap categories. Once you can name the trap, you can train against it.

These three are a fraction of what appears in a real UCAT sitting. There are eight trap types in total, several of which are harder to spot than anything covered here. Our UCAT Complete Guidance works through all of them — with a pre-lesson diagnostic showing you which gaps to close first.

If VR is the section holding your score back, book a free diagnostic consultation to identify exactly which traps are costing you marks and how to fix them before exam day.

TOOL · UCAT ANZ 2026

UCAT Score Calculator 2026: Find Your Percentile Instantly

Enter your total UCAT score to see your exact percentile, which universities are within reach by state, and what the 2025 cutoffs looked like.

Your UCAT Percentile Calculator

9001,8002,700
50th percentile

UCAT Score Conversion Table 2026

How many questions correct per subtest to reach a given scaled score?

VR: 44 questions · DM: 29 questions · QR: 36 questions. Each subtest scales 300–900. Figures based on historical UCAT ANZ sitting data — official conversion tables are not published by UCAT ANZ.

Scaled ScoreVR (/44)DM (/29)QR (/36)
Low (300–480)
3000–50–30–3
350856–7
40011710–11
45014914–15
48015–161016
Below average (500–580)
500171117
53018–191218
550201319
58021–221420
Average (600–680)
600231521
63024–251622
650261723
68027–281824
Competitive (700–740)
700291925
73030–312026
High Competitive (750–900)
750322127
78033–342228
800352329
83036–372430
850382531
88039–402632
90041–4427–2933–36
SJT ScoreQs%ile
<525≤38Bot. 20%
525–54939–41Top 80%
550–56942–44Top 70%
570–58845–47Top 60%
589–60648–50Median
607–62051–53Top 40%
621–63954–56Top 30%
640–66357–60Top 20%
664+61–69Top 10%

SJT: 69 questions, separate from the cognitive total. Most universities use it as a tiebreaker or minimum threshold only.

Our students' median scores
VR78033 / 44
DM80023 / 29
QR85031 / 36
Highlighted in gold in the table ←
What this table tells you

The conversion is non-linear — extra correct answers in QR matter more at 800+ than at 600. If QR is dragging your total, that's where the fastest gains are. Our world's first UCAT diagnostic improvement test pinpoints exactly which question types you're dropping marks on per subtest.

We've supported students through score improvements of 300+ points on their UCAT. If you want a clear picture of what's holding your score back and a comprehensive plan that can move your score significantly, book a free diagnostic consultation — no obligation, just answers.

FREE DIAGNOSTIC TEST
See your improvement now →